BDG0119 Coaching Stance

DESCRIPTION: Principals, directors, or instructional coaches who complete this lesson can utilize a combination of three stances appropriately when discussing instructional performance with teachers. Evidence of learning is shown through an assessment called a performance of understanding.

BACKGROUND: The following resources provide the basic framework of the three coaching stances and give specific positive and negative examples of what these stances look and sound like when put into practice.

For the purpose of reviewing this research, the terms mentoring and coaching should be considered synonyms. Likewise, though different language and levels are used to describe coaching stances in the literature, these three terms—Instructive, Collaborative, and Facilitative—will be used for the purposes of this micro-credential.

Lipton, L. & Wellman, B. (2017). Learning-focused interactions: A continuum. In L. Lipton & B. Wellman (3rd Ed.), Mentoring matters: A practical guide to learning-focused relationships (p. 19-27). MiraVia, LLC. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/12mJMMNJdEtoSqgKHne_YWR5myNAG-nkG/view?usp=sharing

Heineke, S. F. (2010). Reading coaching discourse: Practical applications. Literacy coaching
research and practice, 67-89. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w4O7pyWIBk8t0dQ0nbTks6QMLjC8wir3/view?usp=sharing

Costa, A. & Garmston, R. (2002). Three coaching maps. In R. J. Garmston, Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools (p. 33-54, 191-218). https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AXgkA6IPB1WV6leyBkJbLnpEAve-_EIM/view?usp=sharing

LESSON OUTCOMES:

  1. Communicate different stances using non-evaluative, trusting language and use responsive statements in meaningful ways with a teacher in a coaching conversation.
  2. Read and apply the information from the following chapters:
    Lipton, L. & Wellman, B. (2017). Learning-focused interactions: A continuum. In L. Lipton & B. Wellman (3rd Ed.), Mentoring matters: A practical guide to learning-focused relationships (pp. 19-27).
    Costa, A. & Garmston, R. (2002). Three coaching maps. In R. J. Garmston, Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools (pp. 33-54, 191-218).
  3. Provide evidence (performance of understanding) to show how coaching stances are used to increase teacher learning.

RESOURCES:

Articles

Hennissen, P., Crasborn, F., Brouwer, N., Korthagen, F., & Bergen, T. (2008). Mapping mentor teachers’ roles in mentoring dialogues. Educational research review, 3(2), 168-186.

Heineke, S. F. (2010). Reading coaching discourse: Practical applications. Literacy coaching research and practice, 67-89.

Books

Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Norwood, MA.

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2017). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th edition). Pearson.

Lipton, L. & Wellman, B. (2017). Learning-focused interactions: A continuum. In L. Lipton & B. Wellman (3rd Ed.), Mentoring matters: A practical guide to learning-focused relationships. MiraVia.

Lipton, L., & Wellman, B. M. (2014). Learning-focused supervision: Developing professional expertise in standards-driven systems. MiraVia.

Videos

Video to identify coaching stance within a coaching discourse:

Schaefer, J. & Meyer, J. (2015). https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=IUCxKrHoeYo

New Teacher Center (2015). http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid3577768777001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAA_JIAxrk~,DnC1yUWJQ19bHAT6-AjWgVKasRid9G-c&bctid=4171186110001

Weblinks for Standards

New Teacher Center: Instructional Coaching Practice Standards

WELS Teaching Standards

Global Teaching Learning Standards

Connecting Coaching Stance to Practice

Martin Luther College Course (Graduate Level-3 credits) EDU5302 Supervision of Instruction

Permission Slip Samples

Micro-Credential Permission Slip Sample-PDF

Micro-Credential Permission Form Sample-Word